Which would you choose....

[Defying]

A Standard Book with -110 book....

Or

A book that doesn't charge juice. Standard Wagers are +100 on both sides, except your charged 10% of your payouts.

 

[CHOPTALK]

B

 

[CHOPTALK]

B

And its not close

 

[CHOPTALK]

If anyone picks A they are dumb

 

[Defying]

If anyone picks A they are dumb

I have an opinion on it, but ill let others give there first. I'm not sold either way.

 

[CHOPTALK]

I have an opinion on it, but ill let others give there first. I'm not sold either way.

There is only 1 correct answer.

You only pay the juice when you win with B.
With A you pay the juice win or lose.

 

[MattyMatt]

If anyone picks A they are dumb

...

 

[CHOPTALK]

Bold statement with no explanation.

I just explained it.

Did not think it needed an explanation.

 

[MattyMatt]

I tried to delete. Too late. Calling people dumb without an explanation why you think they are dumb is kinda dumb. just sayin

 

[PatsFan1283]

I tried to delete. Too late. Calling people dumb without an explanation why you think they are dumb is kinda dumb. just sayin

And BTW, you are wrong.

He is clearly right the answer is A

 

[MattyMatt]

Example A

10 wagers @ -110 for $100 each

Win 6 = $600
Lose 4 = $440
Profit = $160

Example B
10 wagers @ +100 for $100
6 wins = $600
4 loses = $400
profit = $200 - $20 (10%) $180

 

[MattyMatt]

He is clearly right the answer is A

I just explained how B is right. ANd he thinks the answer is B, BTW.

 

[CHOPTALK]

The easiest know is the fact that no books are offering this.

It would be a great way for a new book to create a new gimmick.

Come to ABC sportsbook where you pay no juice.
All you have to do is give up 10% of your payout.

 

[CHOPTALK]

He is clearly right the answer is A

No chance A is right.

 

[CHOPTALK]

Example A

10 wagers @ -110 for $100 each

Win 6 = $600
Lose 4 = $440
Profit = $160

Example B
10 wagers @ +100 for $100
6 wins = $600
4 loses = $400
profit = $200 - $20 (10%) $180

Also much easier to hedge and middle.

A book offering that would go out of business in 2 months.

 

[PatsFan1283]

No chance A is right.

whoops I meant B, you were clearly right. Just said wrong letter

B clearly right

 

[MattyMatt]

The easiest know is the fact that no books are offering this.

It would be a great way for a new book to create a new gimmick.

Come to ABC sportsbook where you pay no juice.
All you have to do is give up 10% of your payout.

Def a great selling point. I would have no problem running or playing under those rules.

 

[MattyMatt]

Also much easier to hedge and middle.

A book offering that would go out of business in 2 months.

Disagree, but I agree with B and we will leave it at that.

 

[CHOPTALK]

Disagree, but I agree with B and we will leave it at that.

Well at the very least you would be able to buy out of a wager for free instead of paying the vig to get out of a bet with no line movement.

 

[PatsFan1283]

Disagree, but I agree with B and we will leave it at that.

What do you disagree with that he says? If a book offered even money and wasn't tight as shit in regards to limiting sharp action, cutting players off, etc they would go out of business fast...